Cases 21 - 30 of 72,324
Walker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Derrick S. Walker
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Walker, (fnu) Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Mathew L. Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUZ v. DONDON et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ CRUZ
Defendant:
DONDON, M WILLIAMS, SHEREA GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Seamster et al
as 4:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mark Trenton Williams
Defendant:
Seamster, Ball, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Drake et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Drake, Brian Coleman, Mr. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Williams v. Gary Hammer, et al
as 24-2006
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GARY HAMMER, DETECTIVE, MARK MAZZITELLI, DETECTIVE, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Williams v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Mathew L. Williams
Defendant:
Mary Baker, Scott Weisenthal, Susan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chatman v. The City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2024cv50132
Plaintiff:
William Chatman
Defendant:
The City Of Rockford, The City of Cherry Valley, Swedish American Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Derrick DeShun Roberts
Defendant:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
