Cases 31 - 40 of 855
Alvarado v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv01018
Petitioner:
Edwin Alvarado
Respondent:
Scott Ceresini and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarado, Jr. v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Ruben Alvarado, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis et al
as 5:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Lucas Palacios Alvarado
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis, Alejandro Mayorkas, Kenneth Genalo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Defendant:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alvarado v. Miller
as 6:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alvarado
Defendant:
Gene Miller and FNU Ransfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Lucas Billie, et al
as 23-2610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS BILLIE, DANILLE JONES, JESSE JONES and others
Alvarado v. Burns et al
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Burns and Ryan Kuepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Lopez-Alvarado v. USA
as 23-12460
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMON LOPEZ-ALVARADO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvarado v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03338
Petitioner:
Jesus Rivera Alvarado
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes, FCI Jessup and Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarado v. Jean Paul-Biky Biky et al
as 4:2023cv02766
Plaintiff:
Mike Joseph Alvarado
Defendant:
Jean Paul-Biky Biky, Chukwu Anderson, Daniel Colquitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
