Cases 31 - 40 of 1,283
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Defendant:
Davis, Sneed, Shane and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois, Julie Moore Wolfe, Jim Root and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. McRae et al
as 1:2024cv00887
Defendant:
Yu, Portia Bennett, Mark Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Owen Morris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Cornett et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Alex L. Hale and Alex L Hale
Defendant:
T Cornett, Henrich and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau and James Allen Babineau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres, Jaquez and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Roanoke City Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Nelson
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail, Lt. Earls, Sgt. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10767
Petitioner:
HALE R. HARRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hale-El (PS) v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Ramirez, Kramer and Mora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
