Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 25,928
Darrion Brown v. City of Urbana, Illinois, et al
as 24-1809
Plaintiff: DARRION BROWN
Defendant: CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS, RICHARD SURLES, MICHAEL CERVANTES and others
Brown v. DHS
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff: Kenneth A Brown
Defendant: DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant: THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyner v. Arnold et al
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff: Scott Tyner
Defendant: Dr. Unknown Arnold, Warden Unknown Brown, Unit Manager Loretta Crockett and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hillsborough County Jail et al
as 8:2024cv01102
Plaintiff: Curtis Wayne Brown, II
Defendant: Hillsborough County Jail and Corporal Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Wheeler v. Joe Williams, et al
as 24-11520
Plaintiff: JOHNATHAN ALLEN WHEELER
Defendant: JOE WILLIAMS, GREGORY DAVIS, DEREK CLUPPER and others
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner: JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent: DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: LEONARD BROWN
Defendant: WARDEN M. WASHINGTON, SOE VENELLI, CMC ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowell v. Kobayashi
as 24-20201
Plaintiff: Matthew Scott Dowell
Defendant: Warden H. Kobayashi, FDC Warden, Lieutenant Standley, Special Housing Unit Lieutenant, Lieutenant Brown, Lieutenant at FDC and others
Marlon Brown v. Romeyn Zabala
as 24-11443
Plaintiff: MARLON MIGUEL BROWN
Defendant: ROMEYN ZABALA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?