Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Flynn v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020cv00521
Defendant:
John Doe Members of the Utilization Management Section, Stephen M Wilson, John and Jane Does, Medical Staff Employed by North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine M Flynn and Catherine M. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. James
as 5:2020cv03013
Petitioner:
Bernard Bagley
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, Alan M Wilson and Tonya James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grandinetti v. Barajas et al
as 1:2020cv00347
Defendant:
Wesley Mun, Albert Maples, M. Wilson and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas, Dr. Assa and Dr. Faltas
Defendant:
John H. Strom, Dinah Gail Steele, Hugh Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv01706
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
Beth Drake, U.S.D.C.-Dist. of So. Car. Divs., H. D. McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01705
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
B. Stirling, R. B. Harwell, S. C. Admin. Law Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv01360
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beth Drake, Donald J Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
B Stirling, A M Wilson, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01073
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00827
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
