Cases 31 - 40 of 8,672
Marshall v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stephan L Marshall
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phillip Pond v. Daniel Mosteller, et al
as 24-1972
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Pond
Respondent:
Daniel C. Mosteller, United States Marshals, Kevin Thom and others
Lennie Perry v. Charles W. Mulaney, et al
as 24-1792
Petitioner:
LENNIE PERRY
Respondent:
CHARLES W. MULANEY, MICHELLE MARIE PETERSEN, JOHN DOE, U.S. Marshal and others
v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ryan Glover
Defendant:
Marshall County Drug Task Force, Marshall County Sheriff's Department, Marshall County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckley v. Marshall et al
as 6:2024cv06065
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Buckley
Defendant:
Jailer Zack Marshall, Jailer Jodie Law and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03661
Plaintiff:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America, The Marshals of the USA and The Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
