Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Day v. Prosser et al
as 0:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tyrus E Day
Defendant:
Detective Prosser, Timothy Ramsey, Detective Starkie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Kelly v. Ortega et al
as 2:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Kelly
Defendant:
Stephen A Ortega, Mathew E Borunda, Kip B Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Adams et al
as 2:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Kelly
Defendant:
John H Adams, Jamie L Baker, Paul W Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam v. Humphrey et al
as 1:2009cv03605
Plaintiff:
Derek B. Adam
Defendant:
Theodora Humphrey, Vicki Salvatore, Ramonita Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
Robert B. Adams, Pat Giddene, Amber Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
Robert B Adams, Pat Unknown, Amber Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lancaster County Attoney Office et al
as 4:2008cv03154
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Attoney Office, Health and Human Services Administration, I.C.C.U. Region V and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01579
Petitioner:
Lonnie B Adams
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finch v. Adams et al
as 4:2007cv00139
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Finch
Defendant:
Robert B Adams, Samuel B Eaton and Robert Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Greene v. B Adams et al
as 2:2007cv03722
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
B Adams, W Moore and J Romo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
