Cases 31 - 40 of 67,991
Romaine v. Joseph
as 1:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Durell George Romaine
Respondent:
Evan Joseph
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hackborn v. Parsons, et al
as 24-1264
Petitioner:
DEAN D. HACKBORN
Respondent:
WARDEN PARSONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Matthew (PS) et al v. District Attorney(s)
as 1:2024cv01735
Plaintiff:
Matthew and Norris Merriweather
Defendant:
District Attorney(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Meyers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Askia v. Steinhaus et al
as 6:2024cv06390
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn S. Askia
Defendant:
Robert D. Steinhaus, Robert M. Goldstein, Erie County Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Bohinski, ET AL.
as 3:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
JORGE AGUILAR
Respondent:
JASEN BOHINSKI and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Gray v. US Attorney General
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Joseph Scott Gray
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas Connelly, Jr. v. Warden Berks County Prison, et al
as 24-2099
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN BERKS COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Jason Krumback v. Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-2254
Petitioner:
Jason Krumback
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
