Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Chisolm v. Cazayoux et al
as 3:2012cv00139
Defendant:
Jack E. Bride and Don Cazayoux
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory Chisolm v. William Dupont, et al
as 11-30528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY JAMES CHISOLM
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. DUPONT, JACK E. BRIDE and DON CAZAYOUX
Chisolm v. Dupont et al
as 3:2011cv00057
Defendant:
Jack E. Bride, Don Cazayoux and William C. Dupont
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marinos Gelardos v. Kendra Burr et al
as 10-7710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARINOS GELARDOS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENDRA BURR, Chief Nurse and Medicial Administrator of Medical at St. Brides Corr. Ctr., ALVIN HARRIS, Dr. at St. Brides Corr. Ctr., MICHAEL BROWN, Capt. at St. Brides Corr. Ctr. and others
Chase v. St. Brides Correctional Center
as 3:2010cv00239
Plaintiff:
Chris Chase
Defendant:
St. Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. St. Brides Correctional Center
as 7:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
Chris Chase
Defendant:
St. Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee Wilson, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE O. WILSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of VDOC, J. S. GARMAN, Warden of St. Brides C.C., V. S. ESCALAR, Food Service Supervisor and others
Trevino v. Mc Bride et al
as 1:2008cv01649
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
Mc Bride, Cano and Roberts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnny Fisher v. John Garman
as 08-6824
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY DAVID FISHER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN GARMAN, Warden, St. Brides Correctional Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00212
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
