Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Tony Roberts v. G. Ramos, et al
as 13-56608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. RAMOS, Correctional Officer, in individual capacity, SOT MARANDA, Correctional Sergeant, in individual capacity, D. H. MCALISTER, D-Quad Captain, in individual capacity and others
Roberts v. Trotta et al
as 4:2013cv03154
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, D/E Health Inspector, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Nick Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. L. Ferguson, et al
as 13-55758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson et al
as 5:2013cv00470
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, Timothy Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
King Jr. v. Kent et al
as 4:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Vernon King Jr.
Defendant:
James H. Kent, Anthony Moreno, A Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Kent et al
as 1:2012cv00605
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
James H Kent, Anthony Moreno, A Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Lampert et al
as 1:2012cv00167
Respondent:
Robert Lampert, Daniel Shannon, Eddie Wilson and others
Petitioner:
Martin James Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kennedy v. LaClaire
as 1:2012cv00655
Petitioner:
Charles Kennedy, Jr.
Respondent:
D. E. LaClaire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale v. Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. E. Hale
Defendant:
Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Hash v. C. Williams, et al
as 12-16316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH
Defendant - Appellee:
C. WILLIAMS, BARBARA HAUG, V. M. VACA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
