Cases 31 - 40 of 3,719
Camacho v. Warden of FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Francisco Puga Camacho
Respondent:
USA and Warden of FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Loera #154976 v. Unknown Party
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Francisco Loera
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patino v. USA
as 2:2024cv10785
Petitioner:
Francisco Patino
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zepeda v. Wexford Health Care Source, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Source, Inc., Christine Brown and Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Racine Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Defendant:
Racine Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. San Francisco County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
San Francisco County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valencia v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Francisco Shanchez Valencia and Francisco Sanchez Valencia
Defendant:
Unknown Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
