Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Andrew Wolters v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-30717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW WOLTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FRED MENIFEE, JOE KEFFER and others
Armour v. Fox et al
as 1:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Charles William Armour
Defendant:
John B Fox, Harrall Watts, G Maldonado, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McQueen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Anthony McQueen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Bragg et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Defendant:
Jason K. Axe, Andre Birotte, Jr., M. Travis Bragg and others
Plaintiff:
James S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Defendant:
L. BREESE, MAUREEN CRUZ, BLAKE DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hatten v. Micieli et al
as 2:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
J Micieli, D Mandolfo, J P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatten v. Andert et al
as 1:2010cv00601
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
R. Andert, A. Barker, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. FCI Oakdale et al
as 2:2010cv00079
Petitioner:
Louis Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
FCI Oakdale, Joe Young, G Maldonado, Jr and others
Defendant:
Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 4:2010cv00547
Plaintiff:
Rudy Stanko
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Herrell Watts, Michael K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv02381
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, HERRELL WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
