Cases 31 - 40 of 2,016
Ullom v. Armstrong
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
Terry Glen Ullom
Respondent:
Glen Armstrong and Warden Glen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03235
Petitioner:
Glen Adkins, Jr.
Respondent:
(fnu) Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Heisner et al
as 2:2023cv02067
Petitioner:
Jonathan Glen Turner
Respondent:
RA Heisner, Unknown Birkholz, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Laws v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv03686
Plaintiff:
Randall Glen Laws and Randell Glen Laws
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Kelly Strong, Major Canul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creach v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00836
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tyson Glen Creach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MORRISON v. RIVERA et al
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
BARRINGTON GLEN MORRISON
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSE RIVERA and LIEUTENANT LILLIAN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Richmiller et al
as 3:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
Glen Phillips
Defendant:
Jonathan Richmiller, Brittany P Greene, Andrew Manton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nelson v. Day
as 23-30616
Petitioner / Appellant:
Glen Dale Nelson
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
