Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Yeatman v. Clarke et al
as 3:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Charles Yeatman
Defendant:
H. Clarke and Crystal Willett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Samuels Jr et al
as 3:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
Charles Samuels Jr, D Scott Dodrill, Brian K Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Muhjadin v. Newby et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Abdul Wali Salam Muhjadin
Defendant:
Newby, Williams, Depriest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Clark, Jr. v. H. Vasquez
as 14-41187
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT H. CLARK, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
H. VASQUEZ, Warden
Jeffrey Gardner v. T. Mould
as 14-7084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY JASON GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
T. MOULD, Mailroom Supervisor, PSCC, S. K. YOUNG, Warden, PSCC, G. HINKLE, Reg. Dir. VDOC and others
Joseph Clark v. Laurel District Court, et al
as 14-5140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HAROLD CLARK, aka Joseph H. Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
LAUREL DISTRICT COURT, JODI L. ALBRIGHT, Laurel County Attorney and WENDELL L. HAMMONS, JR., Judge, Laurel District Court
Mugan v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Allan C. Mugan
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Warden Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Vasquez
as 1:2013cv00573
Petitioner:
Robert H Clark
Respondent:
H Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pipkin v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Pipkin
Defendant:
H. Clark, Hester, V. Kazlauskas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Taylor et al
as 2:2013cv00367
Plaintiff:
Reed Max Knight
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, Brian K Short, Jeff Judd and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
