Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Meeks v. USA
as 2:2013cv00024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Morgan Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Meeks v. Hammond et al
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Morgan Meeks
Defendant:
Robin Hammond, Anthony Gallagher, Mark Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tutstone v. Garner et al
as 1:2012cv02963
Plaintiff:
Eric Tutstone
Defendant:
Bruce Garner, John Morgan, Timothy Kolonick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Danny Bridges v. Alvin Keller, Jr.
as 12-7514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY RAY BRIDGES
Defendant - Appellee:
ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Correction, ROBERT HAGGARD, R.N., ALBERT KEITH KUHNE, MD and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, I, MD, S. KILLEY, LPN, JOHN MORGAN, FNP and others
Meeks v. USA
as 1:2012cv00091
Petitioner:
John Morgan Meeks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bowie v. Reed et al
as 1:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
David Alexander Bowie
Defendant:
Allen Reed, Samuel Dotson, Teresa Jardon and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowie v. Reed et al
as 5:2012ct03125
Plaintiff:
David A. Bowie
Defendant:
Allen Reed, Samuel Dotson, Teresa Jardon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
John Morgan , Dustin Cook , Paul Stark and others
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Jeffrey Wells, Jim Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrod v. Harkleroad et al
as 1:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marion Lamont Sherrod
Defendant:
Sid Harkleroad, John Morgan, N.P., FNU Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyburn v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Clyburn
Defendant:
John Morgan, Sid Harkleroad, Keith A. Kuhne and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
