Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Karl Kraus, Jr. v. Aaron Smith
as 14-5748
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARL KRAUS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP PARKER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00983
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murphy et al v. Berdanier et al
as 3:2014cv00964
Plaintiff:
David N. Murphy, Fred Williams, Schuylkill County Inmates and others
Defendant:
Gene Berdanier, Alisha Watson, Gregory Beniston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veren v. U.S. Dept of Justice, et al
as 14-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WARREN VEREN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, MARY HERNDON, Administrator, U.S. Marshal Service and others
Handy, Jr. v. Vigil et al
as 1:2014cv00706
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Defendant:
Vigil, Vigil (I), Ippel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls v. Kraus et al
as 2:2014cv10608
Plaintiff:
Daniel Walls
Defendant:
Kraus, Czarneicki, Mayes and others
ELLIS v. REGAN et al
as 2:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant:
DANIEL D. REGAN, NATHAN HARPER, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatlin v. Osceola County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Isaac Robertson Gatlin
Defendant:
Osceola County Sheriff's Department, Bradley Kraus, Marcos R. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatlin v. Osceola County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv22217
Plaintiff:
Isaac Robertson Gatlin
Defendant:
Osceola County Sheriff's Department, Bradley Kraus, Marcos R. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLASCO v. LAVINE et al
as 1:2013cv00788
Plaintiff:
CONZALOS GLASCO
Defendant:
HOOVER, KRAUS, LAVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
