Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Alexander Matthews v. Michael Pauze
as 15-6372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL RICHARD PAUZE
Alexander Matthews v. US
as 15-6132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RYAN SCOTT FAULCONER, AUSA, CARLA G. COOPWOOD, U.S. Probation Officer, BENNETT A. BROWN, Attorney and others
Searcy v. Richards et al
as 4:2015cv40008
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Searcy
Defendant:
Michael Richards and Nims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Graf v. Maricopa County Durango Jail
as 2:2014cv01263
Defendant:
Maricopa County Durango Jail
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Graf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Pauze
as 1:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Alexander Otis Matthews
Defendant:
Michael Richard Pauze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. PAUZE
as 1:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MICHAEL RICHARD PAUZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander Matthews v. Michael Pauze
as 14-6178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL RICHARD PAUZE, RYAN SCOTT FAULCONER, ALICIA WOJTKONSKI and others
Ceregaini v. Rigo et al
as 2:2013cv01737
Defendant:
Unknown Rigo, Unknown Party and Unknown Fieldcamp
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Ceregaini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence et al v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2013cv04044
Plaintiff:
David Belton, Shawn Boyd, Cory Copelin and others
Defendant:
Long Island Bar Association, Suffolk County, Suffolk County Attorney Grievance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton et al v. Suffolk County District Attorney et al
as 2:2013cv03673
Plaintiff:
David Belton, Shawn Boyd, Cory Copelin and others
Defendant:
Long Island Bar Association, Suffolk County, Suffolk County Attorney Grievance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
