Cases 31 - 40 of 372
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Michael Williams, Unit Manager Larry Ross Collins, Captain Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Huddleston et al
as 1:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Victor Huddleston and Antonio Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vue v. Dowling, et al
as 22-5062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ONG VUE
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET DOWLING, Warden, AARON PERUSKIE, Chief of Security, RANDY HARDING, Deputy Warden and others
Williams v. Massie et al
as 3:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Steve Massie, Warden Bridget Hayes and Major Redeo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Comfort et al
as 1:2022cv02891
Plaintiff:
Billy Ralph Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Comfort, Kevin Billips, Sheriff Neil Warran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Williams v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3607
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP
TALLEY et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beller v. Prime Care et al
as 1:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Michael William Beller
Defendant:
Prime Care and Officer Michael Chica 1802
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams (ID 103616) v. Langford
as 5:2022cv03081
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Respondent:
Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anjenai Bolden v. Wyatt Risley, et al
as 22-1670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANJENAI BOLDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WYATT RISLEY, MICHAEL WILLIAMS, DUSTIN FINCH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
