Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Teresa Miller v. WVDOC
as 17-6463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a/k/a WVDOC, COMMISSIONER JIM RUBENSTEIN, WARDEN LAURA LORI NOHE and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, MR. MEED, MR. MEEK and others
Shadeed et al v. Green et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andre Smoot Shadeed, Edward J. Walker, Jr., Muwakkil S. Shabazz and others
Defendant:
T. Green, Lt. Wright, M. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jones v. Corizon, et al
as 15-14003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, Medical Service Provider, JEAN DARBOUZE, Dr., MS. WILSON, Director of Nursing and others
Edward Rasberry v. The State of California
as 2:2015cv05555
Petitioner:
Mr Edward Rasberry
Respondent:
The State of California
Edward Pearson v. R. Crenshaw
as 13-6895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MR. EDWARD PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. CRENSHAW, Correctional Officer
McClellan v. Edwards
as 7:2013cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Mr. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClellan v. Edwards (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Mr. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Matalone et al
as 2:2012cv05083
Defendant:
Ms. Angelakis and Mr. Edward A. Matalone
Plaintiff:
Mr. Tylik Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Corizon et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00786
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Jones
Defendant:
Corizon, Jean Darbouze, Ms. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
