Cases 31 - 39 of 39
George v. Brooks et al
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Levie J George
Defendant:
E Brooks , Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Officer Brooks , FNU Labruke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis Kemp v. Officer Johnson
as 12-6405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS MANDELL KEMP, a/k/a Travis Mandell Kemp
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JOHNSON, GCDC, PHILLIP B. ANDERSON, Greenwood County Detention Center, SHARON MIDDLETON, Cpt GCDC and others
Loos v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00208
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brooks, Correctional Officer Carbojal, Officer "John Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Loos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemp v. Johnson et al
as 8:2009cv03195
Plaintiff:
Travis Mandell Kemp
Defendant:
Officer Johnson, Phillip Anderson, Sharon Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kemp v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv03195
Plaintiff:
Travis Mandell Kemp
Defendant:
Officer Johnson , Phillip Anderson , Sharon Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Brook et al
as 1:2008cv01732
Plaintiff:
Tony Blount
Defendant:
Police Officer Brook, Police Officer Miller and Lower Paxton Township Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyer v. Himelick et al
as 1:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Aaron M Boyer and Aaron M Boyer
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Corporal Sugart, Officer Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harsh et al v. Knab et al
as 2:2008cv00280
Plaintiff:
Robert Harsh, Percy Abernathy and Brian Wofford
Defendant:
Robin Knab, Leah Bob-Itt, Timothy Brunsman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harsh et al v. Knab et al
as 1:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Robert Harsh, Percy Abernathy and Brian Wofford
Defendant:
Robin Knab, Leah Bob-Itt, Timothy Brunsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
