Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Drew v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv10557
Defendant:
Chief Detective Dermot Shea, Asst District Attorn Alissa Wimmer, P/O Wilfred Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. N.Y.P.D. Dept of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv06978
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #1, P O M Prophet #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jr. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill, Kevin v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. O'Neill
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Thornton et al
as 2:2018cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Russell
Defendant:
Stephen W. Thornton, Richard R. Benson, Jr., Paul M. Bican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Boyle v. Humphreys
as 1:2017cv01746
Petitioner:
Ryan P O'Boyle
Respondent:
Robert Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Funches v. Russo et al
as 9:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Trevis L. Funches
Defendant:
Anthony Russo, Blum, C. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Basile v. New York City, NY et al
as 1:2017cv09060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Basile
Defendant:
New York City, NY, James P. O'Neill, Matthew Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims-Lewis v. Debrosse et al
as 1:2017cv03125
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
P/O Dancey Debrosse, P/O Jerome Leisher, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. USA
as 1:2017cv11658
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael P. O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morgan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04703
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1-3 and James P. O'Neill
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Morgan
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
