Cases 31 - 40 of 198
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant:
FREDRICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABRAM v. COLLIER et al
as 3:2020cv04291
Defendant:
MILES DAVIS, GREGORY R MILLER, STEPHEN P PRIESSER and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Miller v. Najera, et al.
as 1:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Edward Moreno, M.D., Fresno County Jail, Officer Guiterrez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Reams et al
as 1:2019cv03225
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Roberts
Defendant:
Steven Reams, A. Wilson and R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavelle R. Miller v. Austin Bremer et al
as 5:2019cv01865
Plaintiff:
Lavelle R. Miller
Defendant:
Unamed Defendant 3, Unamed Defendant 2, Austin Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Futrell, et al
as 2:2019cv00561
Plaintiff:
Dedric Morris
Defendant:
Unknown, James C. Willett, D. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01464
Defendant:
Deborah Fryer, R. Miller, Wexford Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Whiting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Harry, et al
as 3:2019cv01389
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, Laurel R. Harry and District Attorney of York County
Petitioner:
Jarrod R Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Brake et al
as 3:2019cv00801
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
S Brake, Annderson, Daniel Q Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Cook County Jail Medical Staff et al
as 1:2019cv04360
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
IDOC Medical Staff and Cook County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
