Cases 31 - 40 of 414
Walker v. Kostopolus et al
as 2:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Walker
Defendant:
Robert Kostopolus, Sue DeHann, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Webster et al
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Walker
Defendant:
Mr Webster and Waupun Library Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Pyka
as 2:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Walker
Defendant:
RN Jolene Pyka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #620214 v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Javone Smith #620214
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew R. Book, Darin Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv05090
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Sheriff Lafayette Woods, Chief Joseph Gorman, Lieutenant Joyce Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 2:2023cv11250
Plaintiff:
Javone Smith
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew R. Book, Darin Southworth and others
Wallace v. USA
as 5:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Wallace
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robert Thomas v. Patrick Covello
as 23-15593
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2023cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Thomas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toole v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Toole
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
