Cases 31 - 40 of 801
Delgado-Rojas v. United States Of America
as 7:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Delgado-Rojas
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC) Rojas v. Gates et al
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Rojas
Defendant:
Gates, Harris, Tirado-Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rojas v. Secretary of Fla D.O.C. (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv01703
Petitioner:
Carlos Moreno Rojas
Respondent:
Secretary of Fla D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres Rojas v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv11979
Petitioner:
Johanny Torres Rojas
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rojas v. Secretary of Fla D.O.C.
as 1:2023cv23206
Plaintiff:
Carlos Moreno Rojas
Defendant:
Secretary of Fla D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lucas v. Nieto et al
as 3:2023cv04142
Plaintiff:
William Michael Lucas
Defendant:
Tina Nieto, Olguin Banuelos, Gary Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv05580
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Sherry Franks, Robin Souvenir, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas-Meliton v. Lumpkin
as 23-20308
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Rojas-Meliton
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
