Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Locke v. Bueno et al
as 1:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Locke
Defendant:
J. Bueno, D. Stebbins, B. Mello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Stebbins et al
as 1:2017cv00789
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
D. Stebbins, S. Henderson, M. Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stebbins v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv00764
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Stephen Stebbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Henry v. County of Kerrville, et al
as 16-50623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH AARON HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF KERRVILLE, KERRVILLE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, PHILIP KARASEK and others
Henry v. County of Kerrville et al
as 5:2016cv00284
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ables, Robinn Burlew, Gary Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Aaron Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Gustin v. Carter et al
as 3:2015cv01180
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gustin
Defendant:
Carter, Stebbins, Emmanuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Stebbins v. Boone County, AR, et al
as 15-2880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Anthony Stebbins
Defendant - Appellee:
Boone County, Arkansas and Sheriff Danny Hickman
Stebbins v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2014fp00420
Defendant:
FNU Hague, Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent and FNU Palelli
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Stebbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEBBINS v. USA
as 1:2014cv00368
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS STEBBINS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stebbins v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2014cv00302
Defendant:
FNU Goyette, FNU Hauge, Fish Head and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Stebbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
