Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Washington v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00601
Petitioner:
Michael T. Washington
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Gorbey v. OBAMA
as 17-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, United States President Washington D.C., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington DC, LINDSEY GRAHAM, U.S. Senate South Carolina and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Gregory Jackson
as 16-7458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY E. JACKSON, D.C. Superior Ct. Judge, ERIC T. WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, D.C.C.A., GLICKMAN, Associate Judge D.C.C.A. and others
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Jackson et al
as 2:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Gregory E. Jackson, Eric T. Washington, Glickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2016cv00992
Plaintiff:
ANDRE T WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JEFF THOMAS, RN and NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terrance Washington v. USA
as 15-3596
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE T. WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Washington v. USA
as 3:2015cv03781
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darrell T Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Washington #231477 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
Michael T Washington
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Brower and Unknown Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JEAN-EWOLL v. REYES
as 3:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
JEAN-DENIS JEAN-EWOLL
Defendant:
P REYES, B TURNER, V MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
