Cases 41 - 50 of 19,518
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Douglas Eric Hill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sampson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
Robert E. Sampson
Respondent:
Chad Dotson and Eric Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Bonilla v. Grosjean
as 2:2024cv02365
Defendant:
Eric P. Grosjean
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilburn v. Komitee et al
as 1:2024cv06062
Defendant:
Eric Komitee, Gabriel Park, Wachtel Silverberg and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Labat et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Defendant:
Mr. Robert Woff, Sgt. Bentley, Mrs. Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorgay, Robert v. Cromwell, Dan et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Defendant:
Jaycee Schleicher, Eric Barber, Nathan Beier and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Dorgay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Long et al
as 3:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Timothy Kelly and David Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poch v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Defendant:
Lisa Draper, Ryan Bohm and John or Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Eric Poch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Deedra Whitfield, Brandy McMullen, Eric Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brandon Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Woodland, et al
as 2:2024cv01409
Defendant:
TLC Committee, Snake River Correctional Institution and Joe Woodland
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
