Cases 41 - 50 of 666
Tarun Vyas v. Chad Morris
as 23-6625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARUN KUMAR VYAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD MORRIS, Special Agent, V.S.P., ALYCIA ELDRIDGE, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, HEAD OF THE INTERNAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN (I.C.A.C) DIVISION OF VSP and others
Horsey v. Rankins
as 23-6083
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES WELLS HORSEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM RANKINS
Winston v. Rankin Cty, State of MS
as 23-60309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Winston
Defendant / Appellee:
Rankin County, State of Mississippi
Winston v. State of Mississippi
as 23-60302
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher T. Winston
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Rankin County
Rankin v. USA
as 3:2023cv00382
Petitioner:
Roxanne E. Rankin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Laffoon v. Rankins et al
as 5:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Laffoon
Defendant:
Chris Rankins and Tisha Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankin v. LNU #1 (1:23-cv-114) et al
as 1:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Elton Rankin, Jr
Defendant:
FNU LNU #1 (1:23-cv-114) and FNU LNU #2 (1:23-cv-114)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv00439
Petitioner:
David L Jackson
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Beutle et al
as 6:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Deputy Page Beutle, Sheriff Landers, Nurse Viola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
