Cases 41 - 50 of 1,247
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
William Bart Huey
Defendant:
Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. McKinney
as 3:2024cv01140
Petitioner:
Ocean Maite Francis
Respondent:
Warden A. Dulgov and Warden Nancy McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morrison v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Defendant:
United States of America, Indian Health Service Unit, Northern Cheyenne Services Unit, Billings Clinic and others
McKinney v. Tearson
as 2:2024cv02125
Petitioner:
Jason McKinney
Respondent:
Bruce Tearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. Christian et al
as 8:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Micheal Christian, N. Stotler, R. Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Gierach et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
William McKinney
Respondent:
Warden Cromwell, Greg Giese, Angela Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Bradford)
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Clarence McKinney
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. McKinney et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. McKinney, Officer Burnette, Secules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
