Cases 41 - 50 of 28,695
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony McKinney v. Denise Paddock, et al
as 24-3401
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
DENISE PADDOCK, Librarian c/o at LOCI, in their individual and official capacity, LIEUTENANT R. KAMMER, at LOCI in their individual and official capacity, LIEUTENANT SHAWN FRYE, at LOCI in their individual and official capacity and others
Acosta v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01693
Petitioner:
Peter Acosta
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Delon Scott
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Estes v. Vaca
as 2:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Tyrone B. Estes
Defendant:
Vaca Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittaker v. USA
as 3:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
