Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Kelly v. Copenhaven
as 1:2013cv00708
Petitioner:
Leroy J Kelly
Respondent:
Copenhaven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cleveland Rogers v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 13-1544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEVELAND ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, in her Official and Individual Capacities, DANIEL H. HEYNS, in his Official and Individual Capacities, MARY BERGHUIS, in her Official and Individual Capacities and others
US v. Leroy Kelly
as 13-6592
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEROY J. KELLY
Kelly v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisions, et al.
as 1:2013cv00117
Petitioner:
Leroy J Kelly
Respondent:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisions and Copenhaven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00081
Petitioner:
Artavious J. Kelly
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manzanillo v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv05983
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Manzanillo
Defendant:
Gregory D. Lewis, Maureen McLean, K. McGuyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. BARRONE et al
as 2:2012cv01706
Plaintiff:
RICKY DOUGLAS
Defendant:
OFFICER BARRONE, OFFICER J. KELLY, CAPTAIN STANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Edge v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2012cv01075
Plaintiff:
Hafi A. Edge
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Metro North Transit Authority Police Department, M. Stoehrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Leroy Kelly
as 12-6937
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEROY J. KELLY
Barclay v. New York
as 12-1593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. Patrick Barclay
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Thomas Ricks, Superintendent, Captain Racette and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
