Cases 41 - 50 of 69
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Grandinetti v. Mowry et al
as 2:2015cv02492
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
S Mowry, Unknown Goedecke, Unknown Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Mowry et al
as 2:2015cv02490
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
S Mowry, M Ortega, Unknown Goedecke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Amado Loza-Azarte
as 14-51119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMADO LOZA-AZARTE, also known as Pisto, also known as Amado Loza, also known as Amando Loza-Azarte
Loza v. Sherman
as 3:2014cv01969
Petitioner:
Michael A. Loza
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loza-Azarte v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00564
Plaintiff:
Amado Loza-Azarte
Notice Only Party:
Charles Pleasant
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Loza-Serrano v. Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Mario Loza-Serrano
Defendant:
Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility and Dalby Correctional Officers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Angelo Serrato v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv00449
Defendant:
Deputy Sgt Austin, Deputy Baltazar, Rommel Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Serrato
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
