Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Ayodele v. Hudgins et al
as 1:2019cv00183
Defendant:
AUSA Flowers, AW Messer, Warden Hudgins and others
Plaintiff:
Quadiri Ayodele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Reinbolt et al
as 6:2019cv06672
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Jane Doe, AUSA Melissa Marangola and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLAUGHLIN v. HENRY et al
as 1:2019cv09451
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, TIMOTHY HANDING, TODD EDWARD HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02150
Defendant:
Kevin I. Foust, Unknown FBI DTOU UC, Maureen E. Mazzolla and others
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv03663
Defendant:
AUSA Paul E. Budlow and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dean Aviles v. George Chapman, et al
as 18-56167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN HIMBLER AVILES, AKA Dean Aviles
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE CHAPMAN, On official capacity as Senior Special Agent FOS, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER, of Glynco, Georgia - A business premises, THOMAS J. SMITH, No. 9570047, as Federal Protective Service Inspector and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06897
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-6043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fabian Morrison v. Karen Rochlin, et al
as 17-14970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FABIAN MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROCHLIN, AUSA, COLEMAN MEDIUM OFFICIALS, WARDEN and others
Fabian Morrison v. Karen E. Rochlin, et al
as 17-3354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FABIAN T. MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN E. ROCHLIN, AUSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
