Cases 41 - 50 of 227
Belcher v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2021cv01735
Petitioner:
Christopher Belcher
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv01496
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Dep. Kiwan, Sgt. Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Cecil Craig, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banshee et al v. Stirling et al
as 6:2021cv01860
Defendant:
Terre K Marshall, Williams Akerman, Michael Hedgecock and others
Plaintiff:
Musa Banshee, Malik A Al-Shabazz, Randolph Ashford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Hanson et al
as 8:2021cv01220
Plaintiff:
Cecil Edward Craig
Defendant:
FNU Popkowski, Chap Hanson, FNU Belcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Flannery et al
as 2:2021cv02032
Defendant:
Macon County Jail Kitchen Staff, Unknown Defendant, . Belcher and others
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Belcher et al
as 2:2021cv02029
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamar Walker
Defendant:
Macon County Jail, . Grimm, . Belcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv02300
Defendant:
Jaimie Belcher, Antonio Brown, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson and Matthew R Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Flannery et al
as 2:2020cv02244
Defendant:
Kam Dowdy, . Belcher, Sunni Delahunty and others
Plaintiff:
James A Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Belcher et al
as 2:2020cv00560
Defendant:
Dustin Caruthers, Zachary Belcher and Justin Hicks
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Boykin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00438
Petitioner:
Dean Ashton Belcher
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
