Cases 41 - 50 of 22,795
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00434
Petitioner:
Christopher T King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Avist v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Avist
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steelman v. Steelman et al
as 6:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steelman
Defendant:
James Steelman, Tresa Steelman, Colombo Mummers P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. CARR
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasniak v. Arnette et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jasniak
Defendant:
Aaron Arnette, Trevor Milleson, Robert Kirchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gonzales v. Antwan
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Tony Christopher Gonzales
Defendant:
Antwan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Henry v. Nurse Lydia
as 24-6438
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HENRY, a/k/a Chicken Man
Defendant:
NURSE LYDIA, NURSE TAMARA, NURSE BRITTANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
