Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Brewington v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00793
Plaintiff:
Alterra Brewington
Defendant:
D. Daniels, Sangeeta Doshi, Pat Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Standifird, et al
as 11-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE STANDIFIRD, Warden, TERRY JENKS, Exec. Dir., J. D. DANIELS, Dep. Dir. and others
DANIELS v. GALLO et al
as 5:2011cv04875
Plaintiff:
JASON D. DANIELS
Defendant:
GALLO and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Franklin, et al
as 11-6191
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE BALLARD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC FRANKLIN, JIM RABON, Sentence Administrator, TERRY JENKS, Executive Director and others
Thompson v. Daniels et al
as 5:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gary R Thompson
Defendant:
J D Daniels, Lynnell Harkins, Susan B Loving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azikiwe Daniels v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-40464
Petitioner - Appellant:
AZIKIWE D. DANIELS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robledo v. Leal et al
as 1:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Domingo Robledo
Defendant:
Richard G Leal, Richard D Daniel, Timothy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Franklin et al
as 5:2011cv00400
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Smith
Respondent:
Eric Franklin, Terry Jenks, J D Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ballard v. Franklin et al
as 5:2011cv00310
Petitioner:
Kenneth W Ballard
Respondent:
Eric Franklin , Jim Rabon, Terry Jenks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Standifird et al
as 4:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Jackson
Defendant:
Jane Standifird, Terry Jenks, J D Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
