Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Kirkland v. Unger
as 1:2010cv04410
Petitioner: Robert M. Kirkland
Respondent: D.M. Unger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. CHAMBERLAIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01165
Plaintiff: RASHEED X. JAMES
Defendant: D.M. CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Easley et al
as 5:2009ct03069
Plaintiff: Ronnie Rydell Little
Defendant: Michael F. Easley, Roy Cooper, Theodis Beck and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chiaia v. Metcalfe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01142
Plaintiff: Zachariah Chiaia
Defendant: R. Metcalfe, A. Williams, D.M. Mantel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowell v. California Dept of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv04843
Plaintiff: James Edward Bowell
Defendant: M. Evans, J. Baker , E. Mata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Unger
as 9:2008cv01023
Petitioner: Timothy Bush
Respondent: D.M. Unger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ruffin v. Christian et al
as 1:2008cv00969
Plaintiff: Wilbert Ruffin
Defendant: D.M. Christian, Aponte and Buffkin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dennis v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2008cv00712
Plaintiff: Ronald A Dennis
Defendant: D.M. Vaughn, L. Thompson, Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOTSON v. CHAMBERLAIN et al
as 5:2008cv00149
Petitioner: MONIQUE D. DOTSON
Respondent: D.M. CHAMBERLAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drew v. Jabe et al
as 7:2007cv00428
Plaintiff: Troy Dewyon Drew
Defendant: John Jabe, Gene Johnson, Larry W. Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?