Cases 41 - 50 of 612
Jay Harris v. Richard Ball, et al
as 23-2388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Warden Richard Todd Ball, Ouachita River Unit of the Arkansas Division of Correction, Director Dexter Payne, ADC, Dr. Guy Michael Henry, ORU and others
Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Deangelo M Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Toomer v. Tolson et al
as 5:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Shamond Toomer
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John Hicks and Rodney Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Whitaker v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Whitaker
Defendant:
Medical Staff Caddo Correctional Center and Dr Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone v. Tidewater Regional Jail
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Boone
Defendant:
Tidewater Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, DeAngelo v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danny Nichols, Jr. v. Kaure, et al
as 23-1387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY ALBERT NICHOLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE PRACTITIONER KAURE, JODI DEANGELO, Warden, DR. VINDHYA JAYAWARDENA and others
Holder v. Cooley
as 6:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holder v. Cooley
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claybron v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv10840
Plaintiff:
Jovan Claybron
Defendant:
Jodi DeAngelo, Woodland Center Correctional Facility, Heidi Washington and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
