Cases 41 - 50 of 615
Kra Brooks v. United States
as 23-2603
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kra Deangelo Brooks, (originally named Kra Brooks)
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Watson v. Quinones et al
as 6:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jermetras Deangelo Watson
Defendant:
Chief Louis A. Quinones, Jr., Judge Tarlika Nunez-Navarro, Officer of Orange Co Dalton Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Woodland Center Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv11534
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Woodland Center Correctional Facility, Jodi Deangelo, Michael Higginsbotham and others
Boone v. Tidewater Regional Jail
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Boone
Defendant:
Tidewater Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toomer v. Tolson et al
as 5:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Shamond Toomer
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John Hicks and Rodney Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Whitaker v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Whitaker
Defendant:
Medical Staff Caddo Correctional Center and Dr Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Deangelo M Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown, DeAngelo v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. L S U
as 5:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Whitaker
Defendant:
L S U
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley
as 6:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
