Cases 41 - 50 of 36,618
McHenry v. Lumpkin
as 24-10481
Petitioner:
Jimmy Floyd McHenry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Flowers v. Lumpkin
as 24-10486
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Flowers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Marion Chapman v. Clay Stanton, et al
as 24-2132
Plaintiff:
Marion M. Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, Warden, Department of Corrections, G. Fife, Records Officer, Brittany Tischer, P&P and others
Class v. Lumpkin
as 24-10483
Petitioner:
Luis E. Class
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Cook v. Michelle Dunham, et al
as 24-1466
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. COOK, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE DUNHAM, GOA Mailroom, CARRIE KIENITZ, GOA Mailroom, SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden and others
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-20239
Petitioner:
Robert F. Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Williams v. Burleson County
as 24-50430
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Burleson County Sheriff, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
