Cases 41 - 50 of 647
Wilson v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Wilson v. Deputy Queen
as 23-6572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY QUEEN, DEPUTY HARA, DEPUTY BURROWS and others
Vincent Wilson v. Beth Arthur
as 23-6571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BETH ARTHUR, Sheriff of Arlington County Detention Facility and JOHN DOE, Sheriff of Fairfax County Detention Facility
DENT v. IRWIN
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
RICHARD WILSON DENT and ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, ELLIOT L. SMEAL, DANIEL McCARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. U.S. District Court et al
as 3:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Judge David J. Novak, Judge Mark R. Colombell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. U.S. District Court et al
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Judge David J. Novak, Judge Mark R. Colombell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01798
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Fiero, Ms. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Williams v. D. LaCroix
as 23-15751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LACROIX, Correctional Officer
Brown v. Harrison et al
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Elliot Brown
Defendant:
Warden Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
