Cases 41 - 50 of 475
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Jones v. McCoy
as 22-7361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY J. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCOY, C/O at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, B. HURLEY, C/O at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, SHANNON KEEN and others
Hurley v. Owens et al
as 7:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Josephn F. Hurley
Defendant:
Billy Owens, Brook Owens, Ricard Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McCoy et al
as 7:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Jones
Defendant:
McCoy, B. Hurley, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Withers et al
as 5:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Shannon D. Withers, FNU Philips, FNU Furchurm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. State of New York DOCCS et al
as 1:2022cv08902
Plaintiff:
Joseph Logan
Defendant:
State of New York DOCCS, Department of Corrections Defendants, DR. Dar Qutubuddin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Diaz v. Hurley, et al
as 22-16416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
HURLEY, FARMAR, HALL and others
Karsten Allen v. B. Sater
as 22-6930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER B. SATER, SERGEANT E. J. DALES, OFFICER B. VIARS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
