Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Lohnes v. Buncich et al
as 2:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Defendant:
Sheriff Buncich, Adm Davies, Deputy Warden Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Watson
as 1:2017cv01258
Petitioner:
James Andrews
Respondent:
Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lohnes v. Buncich et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Respondent:
John Buncich and Mr Davies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crump v. Galino et al
as 2:2016cv00832
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Crump
Defendant:
Rosemarie C Galino, Aileene Chovanec and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson et al v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Henderson, Pedro Pedroza, Steve Hoo and others
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckenrode v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Eckenrode, Jr.
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starkey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01797
Petitioner:
James Andrew Starkey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Ellason v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-20507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DEWAYNE ELLASON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, KYLE JORDAN NASH, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Transport Driver, JAMES ANDREWS, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Transport Driver and others
Arender v. USA
as 1:2015cv00153
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Andrew Arender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ellason v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv03730
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dewayne Ellason
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Kyle Jordan Nash, James Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
