Cases 41 - 50 of 128
HEARNS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv03534
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, KENNETH GOODMAN, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L. HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havard v. Havard et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Narcotics Task Force, Lucedale Police Dept., Jane and John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Thomas Havard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Lavender et al
as 2:2020cv03193
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOE, George W Lavender, Jr. and John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Admin Melissa Bennett and Melissa Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALSH v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
KEVIN COWAN, JOHN DOES #1-20, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB DANIEL WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sparks v. Holland et al
as 9:2019cv01269
Defendant:
William LeClair, Patrick Clancy, French and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2019cv00370
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Chief William McManus and Officers John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. ALVEREZ et al
as 2:2019cv09364
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM
Defendant:
CO SANCHEZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2019cv01166
Defendant:
CAPTAIN LIBER, OFFICER WHITE, JOHN CUZZUPE and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATRICK v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2018cv17324
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, LT. KENNEDY, SCO MANDAP and others
Plaintiff:
KHALIL PATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradly Cunningham v. Washington County, et al
as 18-35413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLY M. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE and DOES, Jane and John Does 1-20
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
