Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERKIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
DEPUTY ERIC AMEL, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Parker v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Charles Williams, Thiery Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds, Cornell v. Flood, Patricia et al
as 3:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cornell D. Reynolds
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 4, John and Jane Doe 3, Patricia Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harnage v. Wu
as 18-2285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Vecchairelli, C.N.
Defendant:
Wu, Dr., Correctional Managed Healthcare, Rikel Lightner and others
Harnage v. Lightner
as 18-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Rikel Lightner, Dr. Wu, Correctional Managed Health Care and others
Smith v. Annucci et al
as 6:2018cv06261
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Smith
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, James O'Gorman, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv05769
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, K. Johnson, Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Lockett et al
as 5:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gordon C. Reid
Defendant:
FNU Lockett, FNU Taylor, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Summit County, Ohio and Summit County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv01287
Plaintiff:
Bradford Walker
Defendant:
Summit County, Ohio and Summit County Board of Commissioners, Steve Barry, Dale Soltis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
