Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Jpay
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Jpay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardello-Smith v. JPay, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cardello-Smith and Patricia Lee Thompson
Defendant:
JPay, LLC, JPAY- Securus/securis Technologies Company, JPAY Corporation and others
Bane v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Bane
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Mr. Barry Marano and JPay, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyles #132720 v. Pierce et al
as 2:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Lyles #132720
Defendant:
Carolyn Pierce, Gerald Covert, Patricia Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. JPay, LLC et al
as 7:2021cv09070
Plaintiff:
Dontie S. Mitchell
Defendant:
JPay, LLC, B. McCloskey and Sgt. D. Pauselius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERKA v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00367
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JON PETERKA
Defendant:
MARK S INCH and JPAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubarry et al v. Capra et al
as 7:2021cv05487
Defendant:
Stephen Brandow, Leslie Malin, Jpay Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Dubarry, Harry Rivera and Jayquan Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYER v. JPAY L.L.C.
as 2:2021cv12480
Defendant:
JPAY L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY W.E. MAYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.