Cases 41 - 50 of 1,063
Randle v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv02532
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Thurman Randle
Defendant:
Marian Brown, Malcolm Harden, City of Grand Prairie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. USA
as 7:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Kendrick Naveed Corbin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kendrick Butler v. Richard Orenstein, et al
as 23-3019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDRICK BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD ORENSTEIN, DDS and JOHN DOES
Richard Kendrick v. L. Edmonds
as 23-7101
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
L. EDMONDS, Warden
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7108
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7099
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Johnny Gregory v. Whitfield County Superior Court Judge, et al
as 23-13603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Defendant / Appellee:
WHITFIELD COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, PAT GIDDENE, AMBER WINKLER and others
Paul Kendrick v. George Little, et al
as 23-2911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL KENDRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of the Department of Corrections
Debtor / Appellee:
PSYCHIATRIST PETER SAAVEDRA, SCI Fayette
Adams v. Dahl et al
as 1:2023at00957
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams
Defendant:
Andy Dahl, Fabiola Hernandez, Eric Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kendrick Horton, Shelton Horrelle, Moses Stepan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
