Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Barry Jameson v. John Marshall, et al
as 11-55047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY SIMON JAMESON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, individual and official capacity, Warden of California Mens Colony, D. ENGLER, individual and official capacity, Correctional Counselor II, T. L. COOK, individual and official capacity, Captain of guards at CMC East and others
Hardin Cooper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-31172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARDIN IZELL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOE KEFFER, ANTHONY GARO, S.I.S. and others
Barry Jameson v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv08558
Defendant:
T L Cook, T L Cook, J Does and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 10-3714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Richard v. Pritchard et al
as 0:2010cv02022
Petitioner:
Naarl Richard
Respondent:
Det Pritchard, Jason Roy, D Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRAGG v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2010cv01261
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES, ANDRE A. MAIR, KELVIN S. GANGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephney v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2009cv02898
Plaintiff:
Wade Stephney, Jr
Defendant:
John Ozmint , M Beinor , S Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephney v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2009cv02898
Plaintiff:
Wade Stephney, Jr
Defendant:
John Ozmint, M Beinor, S Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cooper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv00967
Plaintiff:
Hardin Izell Cooper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Joe Keffer, Anthony Garo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
