Cases 41 - 50 of 315
Boyd v. Bailey et al
as 1:2022cv04681
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Inmate Paul L. Bailey, Deontre Williams, Deandre Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. USA
as 9:2022cv04257
Petitioner:
Edwin Marques Jenkins, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BOYD v. GEO GROUP INC RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daious v. Geogoup, Inc. Riverbend Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv04045
Plaintiff:
Boyd Davious and Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Geogoup, Inc. Riverbend Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOATMAN, HOLMES, MORRIS, SMITH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOATMAN, MARQUES HOLMES, DAVID MORRIS and others
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DR. DAUSS, DENNIS REGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Jones v. Sims et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jamerrel Marque Jones
Defendant:
Charlie Sims, Terrell Carson and Chenetta Cains
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
