Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Danny Montana Guerra v. W. Hawkins et al
as 5:2016cv02603
Defendant:
E. Best, E. Best, W. Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Montana Guerra
SELTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04969
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ FELTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLAECHE CORREY, G. MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant Gordon Otte v. W. Hawkings et al
as 5:2016cv01832
Defendant:
E. Best, E. Best, W. Hawkings and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Gordon Otte
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER et al v. PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv03745
Plaintiff:
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER, KEMICO ANTONIO WASHINGTON and P.U.T. MEMBERS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Ingram et al
as 3:2016cv00490
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Allen
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, David Mitchell, Ken Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Ingram et al
as 5:2016ct03144
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Allen
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, David Mitchell, Ken Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallister (ID 96504) v. Goddard
as 5:2016cv03123
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. McCallister
Defendant:
Johnnie Goddard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton Ross, II v. United State
as 16-2104
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clinton Earl John Ross, II, also known as Matthew James McCallister
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
David McCallister v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-50233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID H. MCCALLISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
McCallister v. Stephens
as 5:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
David H. McCallister
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
